Weak Nonmonotonic Probabilistic Logics

نویسنده

  • Thomas Lukasiewicz
چکیده

We present an approach where probabilistic logic is combined with default reasoning from conditional knowledge bases in Kraus et al.’s System P , Pearl’s System Z, and Lehmann’s lexicographic entailment. The resulting probabilistic generalizations of default reasoning from conditional knowledge bases allow for handling in a uniform framework strict logical knowledge, default logical knowledge, as well as purely probabilistic knowledge. Interestingly, probabilistic entailment in System P coincides with probabilistic entailment under g-coherence from imprecise probability assessments. We then analyze the semantic and nonmonotonic properties of the new formalisms. It turns out that they all are proper generalizations of their classical counterparts and have similar properties as them. In particular, they all satisfy the rationality postulates of System P and some Direct Inference property. Moreover, probabilistic entailment in System Z and probabilistic lexicographic entailment both satisfy the property of Rational Monotonicity and some Irrelevance property, while probabilistic entailment in System P does not. We also analyze the relationships between the new formalisms. Here, probabilistic entailment in System P is weaker than probabilistic entailment in System Z, which in turn is weaker than probabilistic lexicographic entailment. Moreover, they all are weaker than entailment in probabilistic logic where default sentences are interpreted as strict sentences. Under natural conditions, probabilistic entailment in System Z and lexicographic entailment even coincide with such entailment in probabilistic logic, while probabilistic entailment in System P does not. Finally, we also present algorithms for reasoning under probabilistic entailment in System Z and probabilistic lexicographic entailment, and we give a precise picture of its complexity. 1Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via Salaria 113, I-00198 Rome, Italy; e-mail: [email protected]. Institut für Informationssysteme, Technische Universität Wien, Favoritenstraße 9-11, A-1040 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected]. Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the Marie Curie Individual Fellowship HPMF-CT-2001001286 of the European Union programme “Human Potential” (disclaimer: The author is solely responsible for information communicated and the European Commission is not responsible for any views or results expressed), by a Heisenberg Fellowship of the German Research Foundation, and by the project Z29-N04 of the Austrian Science Fund. I am thankful to Angelo Gilio and Lluis Godo for useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Many thanks also to the reviewers of the KR-2004 abstract of this paper, whose constructive comments helped to improve this work. Copyright c © 2004 by the authors INFSYS RR 1843-02-02 I

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Representation Independence of Nonmonotonic Inference Relations

A logical concept of representation independence is developed for nonmonotonic logics , including probabilistic inference systems. The general framework then is applied to several nonmonotonic logics, particularly propo-sitional probabilistic logics. For these logics our investigation leads us to modiied inference rules with greater representation independence .

متن کامل

On the Compactness of Nonmonotonic Logics

A weak concept of compactness for nonmonotonic logics is proposed, which is suitable for several nonmonotonic logics, for which Makinsons smallest cumulative extension as well as Freund/Lehmanns canonical extension fail.

متن کامل

A Tableau Algorithm for Paraconsistent and Nonmonotonic Reasoning in Description Logic-Based System

This paper proposes a paraconsistent and nonmonotonic extension of description logic by planting a nonmonotonic mechanism called minimal inconsistency in paradoxical description logics, which is a paraconsistent version of description logics. A precedence relation between two paradoxical models of knowledge bases is firstly introduced to obtain minimally paradoxical models by filtering those mo...

متن کامل

General Approach to Nonmonotonic Logics

Nonmonotonic logics are logics in which theorems can be invalidated by new axioms. In this paper we propose a general framework in which a large class of non­ monotonic logics can be specified. 0. Introduction Traditional logics are monotonic-i.e., theorems of any theory belong to the set of theorems of any extension of the theory. In human reasoning the situa­ tion is different: one's knowledg...

متن کامل

Generalising the Interaction Rules in Probabilistic Logic

The last two decades has seen the emergence of many different probabilistic logics that use logical languages to specify, and sometimes reason, with probability distributions. Probabilistic logics that support reasoning with probability distributions, such as ProbLog, use an implicit definition of an interaction rule to combine probabilistic evidence about atoms. In this paper, we show that thi...

متن کامل

A Logic with Big-stepped Probabilities That Can Model Nonmonotonic Reasoning of System P

We develop a sound and strongly complete axiomatic system for probabilistic logic in which we can model nonmonotonic (or default) reasoning. We discuss the connection between previously developed logics and the two sublogics of the logic presented here.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004